Vocal Rehabilitation with microvascularized phonatory fistula
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.67Keywords:
microvascularized free flap, phonatory fistula, voice, laryngectomy, vocal rehabilitationAbstract
Introduction: Vocal rehabilitation after a total laryngectomy procedure is one of the greatest challenges a Head and Neck Surgery Unit must face. It includes vocal reconstruction without jeopardizing the airway during swallowing. Amongst the methods that achieve this double goal, tracheoesophageal puncture is the most widely used, albeit several drawbacks associated: the need for a high initial phonatory pressure, granulation tissue formation around the shunt, the risk of blocking or dislodging the device, difficulty in changing the prosthesis and the need for a proper and frequent clean up. Permanent care with this devices represent a significant kind of morbidity for the laryngectomized patient, therefore other alternatives must be taken into consideration. One of these is the reconstruction using a microvascularized flap. We present a case report with a functionally satisfactory result.
Material and methods: Case report of a microvascularized phonatory fistula using a forearm flap and literature review. Results: The post surgical follow up of the patient was favorable, achieving a good functional rehabilitation, both subjective and objectively. Vocal quality is quite satisfactory and aspiration during swallowing minimal and free from complications. Flap design allowed a relatively easy construction of the vocal neo- conduct.
Conclusions: Phonatory reconstruction after total laryngectomy with microvascular flap leads to a good vocal quality, no higher risks for aspiration during swallowing and need for minimal long term care, leading to an improvement in the quality of life of the patient. Therefore it should be an option in the absence of contraindications to this technique.
References
Brown DH, Hilgers FJM, Irish JC, Balm AJM. Postlaryngectomy voice rehabilitatin: state of the art at the millenium. World J. Surg. 2003; 27:824-831
Elmiyeh B, Dwivedi RC, Jallali N, Chisholm EJ et al. Surgical voice restoration after total laryngectomy: An overview.Indian Cancer 2010; 47:239-247
Calcaterra TC, Zwitman DH. Vocal rehabilitation after partial or total laryngectomy. Calif Med 1972 Aug;117:12-15
Kobayashi M, Meguro E, Hayakawa Y, Irinoda T. et al. A new technique using free ileocecal patch transplantation for secondary voice restoration after total laryngectomy. J Plast Reconstr Surgery 2008;61:e5-e9
Hussain A, Dolph JL, Padilla JF 3rd, Silver S. Tubed, folded radial forearm free flap for pharyngeal reconstruction and voice rehabilitation (report). Ann Plast Surg. 1993 Jun;30(6):541-544,
Magnilia AJ, Lundy DS, Casiano RC et al. Speech restoration and complications of primary versus secondary tracheoesophageal puncture following total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 1989;99:489-91
Hagen R. Surgical voice restoration following total laryngectomy. HNO 2005. Jul;53(7):602-611
Saito H, Fujieda S, Ohtsubo T, Tsuda G. Tracheoesophageal shunt method with omohyoid muscle loop for voice restoration. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129:321-323
Hagen R. Laryngoplasty with a radialis pedicle flap from the forearm: a surgical procedure for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy. Am J Otolaryngol. 1990 Mar-Apr;11(2):85-89
Hagen R. Voice Rehabilitation after total laryngectomy: a microvascular substitute larynx tube (laryngoplasty) instead of a voice prosthesis. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 1990; 69(4):213-216
Kawahara H, Shiraishi T, Yasugawa H, Okamura K et al. A new surgical technique for voice restoration after laryngopharyngoesophagectomy with a free ileocolic graft. Surg 1992;111:569-75
Chen HC, Mardini S, Salgado CJ, Ozkan O et al. Free microvascular transfer of the vermiform appendix for creation of a tracheo- oesophageal fistula: a new method od voice reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Surgery 2006;59:1233-1240
Chen H, Mardini S, Yang C. Voice reconstruction using the free ileocolon flap versus the pneumatic artificial larynx: a comparison of patient’s preference and experience following laryngectomy. J Plast Reconstr Surgery 2006;59:1269-1275