Universal Newborn Hearing Screening. Five years of experience

Authors

  • Sérgio Caselhos Interno do Internato de ORL, Centro Hospitalar Alto Ave – Unidade de Guimarães, Portugal
  • Rafaela Veloso Teles Interno do Internato de ORL, Centro Hospitalar Alto Ave – Unidade de Guimarães, Portugal
  • Alexandre Mexedo Assistente Hospitalar, Centro Hospitalar Alto Ave – Unidade de Guimarães, Portugal
  • Fausto Fernandes Director de Serviço, Centro Hospitalar Alto Ave – Unidade de Guimarães, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.90

Keywords:

Universal Newborn Hearing Screening, UNHS, hearing loss

Abstract

Hearing impairment is the most common congenital abnormality,
with a reported prevalence of 1-3/1000 live births. Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS) provides early detection of hearing loss.
This allows early intervention which is critical to prevent the adverse consequences on speech, language and cognitive development. The aim of this study was to analyse data obtained by the UNHS at the Centro Hospitalar do Alto Ave (CHAA) in the period from June 2005 to March 2010.

A total of 11033 newborns were screened. In the past three years
more than 95% of all newborns were tested. 0,67% of screened
newborns failed the screening, corresponding to 74 children. Of
these, 45,9% did not have any risk indicators for deafness.

The current results show an improvement in the screening
implementation at our Institution over time. The ocurrence of hearing impairment among children without risk factors at birth reinforces the need for UNHS in newborns.

References

Aidan D, Avan P, Bonfils P. Auditory screening in neonates by means of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: a report of 2,842 recordings. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108:525-31.

Mehl AL, Thomson V. Newborn hearing screening : the great omission. Pediatrics 1998;101:E4.

Morlet T, Moulin A, Putet G, Sevin F, et al. Dépistage des troubles auditifs chez des nouveau-nés à risque. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac 2001;118:11-8. (falta o 4º autor)

Kuhl PK, Williams KA, Lacerda F, Stevens KN, et al. Linguistic experience alters phonetis perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 1992;255:606-8.

Greenough WT, Black JE, Wallace CS. Experience and brain development. Child Dev 1987;58:539-59.

Neville HJ. Neurobiology of cognitive and language processing: effects of early experience. In: Gibson KR, Petreson AC, editors. Brain maturation and cognitive development: comparative and cross-cultural perspectives. Aladine de Guyter Press 1991, p.355-80.

Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey A, Couter D, Mehl A. Language of early and later identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics 1998;102:1161-71.

Keren R, Helfand M, Homer C, McPhilips H et al. Projected cost-effectiveness of statewide universal newborn hearing screening. Pediatrics 2002;106:855-64.

Robertson C, Aldridge S, Jarman F, Saunders K et al. Late diagnosis of congenital sensorineural hearing impairment: why are detection methods failing ? Arch Dis Child 1995;72:11-5.

Vohr BR, Cary LM, Moore PE, Letourneau K. The Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Program: experience with stadewide hearing screening (1993- 1996). J Pediatr 1998;133:353-7.

JOINT COMITEE ON INFANT HEARING. Year 2000 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Am J Audiol 2000;9:9-29.

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS. Newborn and infant hearing loss: detection and intervention. Pediatics 1999;103:527-30.

Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 1978;64:1391-6.

Bonfils P, Francois M, Avan P, Londero A et alP. Spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions in preterm neonates. Laryngoscope 1992;102:182-6.

Boishardy A, Lenoir F, Brami P, Kapella M et al. Expérience du dépistage auditif néo-natal systématique dans le département de l’Eure A propos de 10 835 nouveau-nés. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac, 2005; 122, 5, 223-230

How to Cite

Caselhos, S., Teles, R. V., Mexedo, A., & Fernandes, F. (2012). Universal Newborn Hearing Screening. Five years of experience. Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 50(2), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.90

Issue

Section

Original Article