Smell and taste: 8 years of experience from a Tertiary Center
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.2195Keywords:
Olfactory dysfunction, anosmia, hyposmia, smell, sinonasal, neurosensory, post-infeccious, post-traumaticAbstract
Introduction: Olfactory dysfunction (OD) affects up to 20% of the population. Despite significant progress in olfactory function testing, the diagnosis and treatment of OD remains a challenge.
Aim: To conduct a descriptive and statistical analysis of patients undergoing follow-up for olfaction and taste dysfunction.
Methods: Retrospective study including patients evaluated for olfaction and taste dysfunctions at a tertiary hospital between 2016 and 2023. We collected data on demographics, associated comorbidities, initial severity of OD, symptom duration, other sinonasal symptoms, and therapeutic approach. We used the Sniffin’ Stiks®, validated for Portuguese, to assess olfaction and presented the results as the TDI score. A melhoria do olfato após instituição terapêutica foi tida por um aumento mínimo de 5 pontos no TDI score.
Results: 133 patients were included (81 females, mean age of 54.55 years). According to statistical analysis, the most common presumed etiology was sinonasal disease (60%), presenting worse results in the threshold assessment test than in the odour discrimination and identification tests. Post-infectious OD (12%) had satisfactory results in threshold and discrimination and lower results in odour identification. Patients with neurodegenerative pathology (10%) showed a good result in the threshold assessment but a lower result in odour identification and discrimination. Post-traumatic OD (8%) presented an overall low TDI score. Treatment was according to the presumed etiology. Post-infectious was the etiology with better outcome in terms of TDI score improvement.
Conclusion: Identifying the etiology through the assessment of various presentations and psychophysical patterns of olfaction is essential to develop targeted treatment strategies. However, the correct categorization of etiologies remains a challenge and highlights the need to improve diagnostic strategies.
References
Schäfer L, Schriever VA, Croy I. Human olfactory dysfunction: causes and consequences. Cell Tissue Res. 2021 Jan;383(1):569-579. doi: 10.1007/s00441-020-03381-9.
Hsieh JW, Daskalou D, Detroux V, Sipione R, Senn P, Hugentobler M. et al. Olfactory fluctuation revisited. Laryngoscope. 2020 Oct;130(10):2442-2447. doi: 10.1002/lary.28918.
Whitcroft KL, Cuevas M, Haehner A, Hummel T. Patterns of olfactory impairment reflect underlying disease etiology. Laryngoscope. 2017 Feb;127(2):291-295. doi: 10.1002/lary.26229
Hummel T, Liu DT, Müller CA, Stuck BA, Welge-Lüssen A, Hähner A. Olfactory dysfunction: etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2023 Mar 13;120(9):146-154. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.m2022.0411.
Yang J, Pinto JM. The epidemiology of olfactory disorders. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2016 May;4(2):130-141. doi: 10.1007/s40136-016-0120-6.
Rombaux Ph, Huart C, Balungwe P, de Toeuf C, Collet S, Duprez T. Post-injury smell disorders. B-ENT. 2016;Suppl 26(2):39-46.
Whitcroft KL, Altundag A, Balungwe P, Boscolo-Rizzo P, Douglas R, Enecilla MLB. et al. Position paper on olfactory dysfunction: 2023. Rhinology. 2023 Oct 1;61(33):1-108. doi: 10.4193/Rhin22.483.
Konstantinidis I, Tsakiropoulou E, Constantinidis J. Long term effects of olfactory training in patients with post-infectious olfactory loss. Rhinology. 2016 Jun;54(2):170-5. doi: 10.4193/Rhino15.264.
Haehner A, Tosch C, Wolz M, Klingelhoefer L, Fauser M, Storch A. et al. Olfactory training in patients with Parkinson's disease. PLoS One. 2013 Apr 17;8(4):e61680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061680.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.