Hearing outcomes in ossiculoplasty: comparison between materials using the Ear Environment Risk Score

Authors

  • Diogo Cabral Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia, Hospital Pedro Hispano – Unidade Local de Saúde de Matosinhos, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6868-8209
  • José Pedro Pereira Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia, Hospital Pedro Hispano – Unidade Local de Saúde de Matosinhos, Portugal
  • Gustavo Lopes Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia, Hospital Pedro Hispano – Unidade Local de Saúde de Matosinhos, Portugal
  • José Ferreira Penêda Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia, Hospital Pedro Hispano – Unidade Local de Saúde de Matosinhos, Portugal https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8094-7728

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.3168

Keywords:

Ossiculoplasty, Chronic otitis media

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic otitis media frequently involves destruction of the ossicular chain, resulting in disruption of sound conduction between the tympanic membrane and the oval window. Ossiculoplasty aims to restore sound transmission between these two structures.

The assessment of hearing outcomes after oscilloplasty is challenging due to the heterogeneity of the middle ear environment. The Ear Environment Risk (EER) score was developed to stratify this risk and allow a more objective comparison of surgical outcomes.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of reconstruction materials (autologous vs titanium) on functional success using an EER- adjusted approach.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including patients who underwent oscilloplasty between 2014 and 2024.

The primary outcome was late functional success (≥6 months after surgery) based on the EER index. Comparisons between reconstruction materials were performed using the chi-square (χ2)(χ2) test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the independent association between reconstruction material and outcome, adjusting for oscilloplasty type (PORP vs TORP) and canal wall down mastoidectomy. A secondary sensitivity model additionally adjusted for the presence of cholesteatoma.

Secondary analyses evaluated early (<6 months) versus late (≥6 months) outcomes and the stability of results over time using transition analysis.

Results: A total of 120 ears were included, of which 102 (85.0%) had a late postoperative audiogram (≥6 months).

EER-based functional success was achieved in 65.8% of cases, with no significant difference between autologous reconstruction (61.7%) and titanium reconstruction (70.0%; p=0.413p=0.413 ). These findings were consistent across subgroup analyses.

In the multivariable analysis, reconstruction material was not independently associated with EER- based functional success (adjusted OR 1.44; 95% CI 0.54-3.81). These results remained unchanged after adjustment for ossiculoplasty type (PORP or TORP) and the presence of a radical mastoidectomy cavity. Additional adjustment for the presence of cholesteatoma did not materially alter the findings.

EER-based early success rates (at T1) also did not differ significantly between materials. Transition analysis in the 95 ears with complete follow-up showed that 61.5%61.5% maintained functional success from the early to the late postoperative period. The overall distribution of functional outcome transitions did not differ significantly between materials (p=0.234)(p=0.234) .

Conclusions: Evaluation of ossiculoplasty using an EER-based risk-adjusted model demonstrated comparable hearing outcomes between autologous materials and titanium.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed A; Khan D A; Sharma S C. Ossiculoplasty outcome parameter staging index as a prognostic factor in ossiculoplasty. Indian Journal of Otology 28(3):p 198-203, Jul-Sep 2022. DOI: 10.4103/indianjotol.indianjotol_122_21

Walker DD, Babu SC. History of ossicular chain reconstruction. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2020; 8(1): 61-64. doi: 10.1007/s40136-020-00259-w

Demir UL, Karaca S, Ozmen OA, Kasapoglu F, Coskun HH, Basut O. Is it the middle ear disease or the reconstruction material that determines the functional outcome in ossicular chain reconstruction? Otol Neurotol. 2012 Jun;33(4):580-5. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31824b774c.

Judd RT, Imbery TE, Cluth MB. The utility of numeric grading scales of middle ear risk in predicting ossiculoplasty hearing outcomes. Otol Neurotol. 2020 Dec;41(10):1369-1378. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002776.

Cluth MB, Judd RT, Gurgel RK, Dornhoffer JL, Kutz W, Carlson ML. et al. A multi-center study of ossiculoplasty hearing outcomes and a grading scale of ear environment risk. Laryngoscope. 2025 Apr;135 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S1-S11. doi: 10.1002/lary.31965.

Meyerhoff WL, Kim CS, Paparella MM. Pathology of chronic otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1978 Nov-Dec;87(6 Pt 1):749-60. doi: 10.1177/000348947808700602.

Kayaalp C, Pauna HF, Monsanto RC, Sajjadi H, Paparella MM, Cureoglu S. Ossicular pathology in chronic otitis media. In: Goycoolea MV, Selaimen da Costa S, de Souza C, Paparella MM. (eds) Textbook of Otitis Media: The Basics and Beyond. Springer, 2023. p:389-394.

Abbasi MAU, Khan FA, Hameed AUR, Musani A, Jawed I, Malik M. et al. Comparative efficacy of prostheses in hearing restoration: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Aug;77(8):3296-3307. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05605-2.

Amith N, Rs M. Autologous incus versus titanium partial ossicular replacement prosthesis in reconstruction of Austin type A ossicular defects: a prospective randomised clinical trial. J Laryngol Otol. 2017 May;131(5):391-398. doi: 10.1017/S0022215117000251.

Olaison S, Berglund M, Taj T, Knutsson J, Westman E, Eriksson PO. et al. Hearing outcomes after ossiculoplasty with bone or titanium prostheses—a nationwide register-based study. Clin Otolaryngol. 2024 Sep;49(5):660-669. doi: 10.1111/coa.14191.

Fong JC, Michael P, Raut V. Titanium versus autograft ossiculoplasty. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010 May;130(5):554-8. doi: 10.3109/00016480903338131.

Orfao T, Julio S, Ramos JF, Dias CC, Silveira H, Santos M. Audiometric outcome comparison between titanium prosthesis and molded autologous material. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Aug;151(2):315-20. doi: 10.1177/0194599814533074

Zakzouk A, Bonmardion N, Bouchetemble P, Lerosey Y, Marie JP. Titanium prosthesis or autologous incus for total ossicular reconstruction in the absence of the stapes suprastructure and presence of mobile footplate. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Oct;272(10):2653-7. doi: 10.1007/

Lamba GK, Sohal BS, Goyal JP. Ossiculoplasty: a prospective study on 50 patients using various graft materials. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Nov;71(Suppl 2):1140-1146. doi: 10.1007/s12070-018-01571-0.

Pulec JL, Sheehy JL. Symposium on tympanoplasty. III. tympanoplasty: ossicular chain reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 1973 Apr;83(4):448-65. doi: 10.1288/00005537-197304000-00002.

Published

2026-09-10

How to Cite

Cabral, D., Pedro Pereira, J., Lopes, G., & Ferreira Penêda, J. (2026). Hearing outcomes in ossiculoplasty: comparison between materials using the Ear Environment Risk Score. Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 64(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.3168

Issue

Section

Original Article