A retrospective comparative study between the use of micro-drill vs perforator in the fenestration of stapes footplate in the surgical treatment of otosclerosis

Authors

  • João Carvalho de Almeida Centro Hospitalar do Porto http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7727-8703
  • Ângela Reis Rego Centro Hospitalar do Porto
  • João Vale Lino Centro Hospitalar do Porto
  • José Gameiro dos Santos Centro Hospitalar do Porto
  • Cecília Almeida e Sousa Centro Hospitalar do Porto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.731

Keywords:

Fenestration, Labyrinth, Stapes Surgery, Otosclerosis

Abstract

Objectives: To characterize the population of patients submitted to surgical treatment of otosclerosis, in the ENT Service at the Hospital Center do Porto, and retrospectively compare the use of microdrill vs perforator; To evaluate the hearing results, the duration of the surgery and the length of the hospitalization after the surgery, comparing the use of micro-drill with the one of perforator for fenestration of stapes footplate.

Methods: All patients submitted to stapes surgery between January 2016 and December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 49 patients, corresponding to 49 surgeries, were included in the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups, depending on the technique used for fenestration of stapes footplate - micro-drill or perforator.

Results: The two groups were homogeneous with respect to the patient's baseline characteristics. Regarding the intraoperative parameters, the group of patients in whom the micro-drill for stapes footplate fenestration was used showed a decrease in operative time of about 11 minutes, although not statistically significant (p> 0.05). In addition, a difference was found between the two groups in terms of surgical success (closure of GAO values below or equal to 10 dB) with a higher success rate associated with the use of a micro-drill (86.7 % vs. 76.5%), although, once again, this difference was not statistically significant (p> 0.05).
Regarding the variation of the bone conduction, in a global way, there was an improvement of this pathway with surgery. However, evaluating this variation independently for each frequency, it was verified that in patients where the micro-drill for stapes footplate fenestration was used, there was an average worsening of 0.71 dB in the bone conduction at the 4 kHz frequency, comparatively with patients who used the perforator who had an average improvement of 0.45 dB for the same frequency in the bone conduction, yet this difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: In the study population, there were no statistically significant differences between the two stapes footplate fenestration techniques, although the use of a micro-drill was associated with a shorter duration of surgery and a higher rate of surgical success. However, the use of a micro-drill appears to be associated with a worsening of the bone conduction at the 4 Khz frequency, probably reflecting acoustic trauma. However, this difference was not statistically significant and this aggravation is incipient and not clinically relevant.

References

Vincent R, Sperling NM, Oates J, Jindal M. Surgical findings and long- term hearing results in 3,050 stapedotomies for primary otosclerosis: a prospective study with the otology-neurotology database. Otol Neurotol. 2006 Dec;27(8 Suppl 2):S25-47.

Wegner I, Kamalski D, Tange R, et al. Laser versus conventional fenestration in stapedotomy for otosclerosis – a systematic review. Laryngoscope 2014 Jul; 124(7):1687-93.

Mann WJ, Amedee RG, Fuerst G, Tabb HG. Hearing loss as a complication of stapes surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996 Oct;115(4):324–8.

Handley GH, Hicks JN. Stapedectomy in residency - the UAB experience. Am J Otol. 1990 Mar;11(2):128-30.

Freitas VA, Becker CG, Guimarães RE, Crosara PF, Morais GA, Moura M. Surgical treatment of otosclerosis in medical residency training. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Nov-Dec;72(6):727-30.

Caldart AU, Terruel I, Enge DJ, Kurogi AS, Buschle M, Mocellin M. Stapes surgery in residency: the UFPR clinical hospital experience. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Sep-Oct;73(5):647-53.

H. Yavuz, F. Caylakli, F. Ozer and L. N. Ozluoglu. Reliability of Microdrill Stapedotomy: Comparison with Pick Stapedotomy. Otol Neurotol. 2007 Dec;28(8):998-1001.

Cuda D, Murri A, Morchi P, Solenghi T, Tinelli N. Microdrill, CO2-Laser, and Piezoelectric Stapedotomy: A Comparative Study. Otol Neurotol. 2009 Dec;30(8):1111-5.

Morrison AW. Diseases of the optic capsule – Otosclerosis. Scott-Brown's diseases of the ear, nose and throat. 1979;2:405-64;

Mangham Jr CA. Reducing footplate complications in small fenestra microdrill stapedotomy. Am J Otol. 1993 Mar;14(2):118-21.

Gjuric M. Microdrill versus perforator for stapedotomy Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1990 Oct;15(5):411-3.

Barbara M, Monini S, de Seta E, Filipo R. Early hearing evaluation after microdrill stapedotomy. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1994 Feb;19(1):9-12.

Published

2019-03-20

How to Cite

de Almeida, J. C., Rego, Ângela R., Lino, J. V., Gameiro dos Santos, J., & Almeida e Sousa, C. (2019). A retrospective comparative study between the use of micro-drill vs perforator in the fenestration of stapes footplate in the surgical treatment of otosclerosis. Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 56(3), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.731