Evaluation of otorhinolaryngology knowledge in primary care residents

Authors

  • Tiago Órfão Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia do Centro Hospitalar de São João EPE, Porto, Portugal - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto
  • Filipa Camacho da Corte Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia do Centro Hospitalar de São João EPE, Porto
  • Raquel Aires Pereira USF Ponte Velha, ACeS Grande Porto I - Santo Tirso/Trofa
  • Helena Silveira Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia do Centro Hospitalar de São João EPE, Porto, Portugal - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto
  • Jorge Spratley Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia do Centro Hospitalar de São João EPE, Porto, Portugal - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • Margarida Santos Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia do Centro Hospitalar de São João EPE, Porto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.652

Keywords:

Otorhinolaryngology, Primary Care, Medical Education

Abstract

Introduction: Otorhinolaryngology is one of the most significant areas in Primary Care practice. The main objective of the present study consists in the evaluation of Otorhinolaryngology knowledge in Primary Care Residents (PCR).

Methods: An enquiry including eight theoretical and ten otoscopy images was presented to PCR (n=102). Results were associated to the attendance of an Otorhinolaryngology rotation, the residency year and the Medical School where graduation was concluded.

Results: The average percentage of correct answers was 37% for otoscopies and 65% for theoretical questions. Superior results were observed in PCR who attended the University of Porto Medical School (p=0.01) and completed an Otorhinolaryngology internship (p=0.01). The length of this rotation and the residency year did not influence the results obtained in the questionnaire (p=0.17 and p=0.07, respectively). Ninety-two percent of the residents would like to have more training in Otorhinolaryngology.

Conclusions: The reduced number of correct answers, both in theoretical as in practical questions, is worrisome. The faculty attended and the presence of an Otorhinolaryngology rotation during residency influenced the results.

References

Griffiths E. Incidence of ENT problems in general practice. J Royal Soc Med. 1979;72(10):740-2.

Donnelly MJ, Quraishi MS, McShane DP. ENT and general practice: a study of paediatric ENT problems seen in general practice and recommendations for general practitioner training in ENT in Ireland. Irish J Med Sci. 1995;164(3):209-11.

Campisi P, Asaria J, Brown D. Undergraduate otolaryngology education in Canadian medical schools. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(11):1941-50.

Khan MM, Saeed SR. Provision of undergraduate otorhinolaryngology teaching within General Medical Council approved UK medical schools: what is current practice? J Laryngol Otol. 2012;126(4):340-4.

Haddad J, Jr., Shah J, Takoudes TG. A survey of US medical education in otolaryngology. Arch Otolaryngology- Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(11):1166-9.

American Medical Association. Truth in advertising: 2008 and 2010 survey results. Available from: http://wwwama-assnorg/resources/doc/arc/tiasurveypdf

Pichichero ME, Poole MD. Comparison of performance by otolaryngologists, pediatricians, and general practioners on an otoendoscopic diagnostic video examination. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2005;69(3):361-6.

Error ME, Wilson KF, Ward PD, Gale DC, et al. Assessment of Otolaryngic Knowledge in Primary Care Residents. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013.

Sharma A, Machen K, Clarke B, Howard D. Is undergraduate otorhinolaryngology teaching relevant to junior doctors working in accident and emergency departments? The J Laryngol Otol. 2006;120(11):949-51.

Clamp PJ, Gunasekaran S, Pothier DD, Saunders MW. ENT in general practice: training, experience and referral rates. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;121(6):580-3.

Published

2017-10-30

How to Cite

Órfão, T., Camacho da Corte, F., Aires Pereira, R., Silveira, H., Spratley, J., & Santos, M. (2017). Evaluation of otorhinolaryngology knowledge in primary care residents. Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 54(4), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.652

Issue

Section

Original Article