Impact of nutritional status on surgical outcomes of patients with head and neck tumors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.134Keywords:
Desnutrição, complicações pós-operatórias, tumores da cabeça e do pescoço, MUSTAbstract
Objectives: Malnutrition is reported frequently in patients with tumors of the head and neck. The impact of malnutrition on surgical outcome is not clearly understood. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the level of malnutrition in patients with head and neck tumors and try to establish a relationship with postoperative complications.
Study design: Patients who underwent surgery for advanced head and neck tumors in Oporto IPO were retrospectively studied.
Methods: The medical records were reviewed, looking for MUST and nutritional assessment of possible postoperative complications. The chi-square test was used to relate malnutrition with postoperative complications.
Results: 29% of the patients studied had a higher overall risk of malnutrition or intermediate. This higher risk of malnutrition was significantly predictive of major postoperative complications (p <.05).
Conclusions: Patients with high overall risk of malnutrition or through a higher risk of major complications after surgery.
References
Sako K, Loré JM, Kaufman S, Razack MS. Parenteral hyperalimentation in surgical patients with head and neck cancer: a randomized study. J Surg Oncol 1981;16:391-402
Reilly JJ. Does nutrition management benefit the head and neck cancer patient? Oncology 1990;4:105-115
Brookes GB. Nutritional status – a prognostic indicator in head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985;93:69-74
Todorov P, Cariuk P, Mc Devitt T, Coles B. Characterization of a cancer cachectic factor. Nature 1996;379:739-742
Robbins KT, Favrot S, Hanna D, Cole R. Risk of wound infection in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck 1990;12:143-148
Gottschlich MM, Matarese LE, Shronts EP. Nutrition support dietetics core curriculum, 2nd ed. American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1993
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. January-June: Statistical Bulletin, 1983
Jong de PCM, Wesdorp RIC, Volovics A, Rouflart MMJ. The value of objective measurements to select patients who are malnourished. Clin Nutr 1985;4:61-66
Von Meyenfeldt MF, Meijerink WJHJ, Rouflart MMJ, Buil-Maassen MTHJ. Perioperative nutritional support: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Nutr 1992;11:180-186
Scheltinga MRM. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA): a bedside method for fluid measurement. Studies of the body´s electrical impedance in various models of health and disease. Thesis. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit, 1992
Matthews TW, Lampe HB, Dragosz KD. Nutritional status in head and neck cancer patients. J Otolaryngol 1995;24:87-91
Linn BS, Robinson DS, KKlimas NG. Effects of age and nutritional status on surgical outcomes in head and neck cancer. Ann Surg 1989;207:267-273
THE “MUST” REPORT - Nutritional screening of adults: a multidisciplinary responsibility
Van Bokhorst de van der Schueren M, Van Leeuwen P, Sauerwein H, Kuik D. Assessment of malnutrition parameters in head and neck cancer and their relation to postoperative complications. Head Neck 1997;19:419-425
Hussain M, Kish JA, Crane L. The role of infection in the morbidity and mortality of patients with head and neck cancer undergoing multimodality treatment. Cancer 1991;67:716-721
Bassett MR, Dobie RA. Patterns of nutritional deficiency in head and neck cancer. Otol Head Neck Surg 1983;91:119-125
Westin T, Ahlbom E, Johansson E, Sandstrom B. Circulating levels of selenium and zinc in relation to nutritional status in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:1079-1082