Universal newborn hearing screening at S. João Hospital: first 12 months results

Authors

  • Ricardo Vaz Interno Complementar do Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia, Hospital de S. João-E.P.E.; Assistente Convidado a 40% de Anatomia da Faculdade de Medicina do Porto
  • Jorge Spratley Assistente Hospitalar Graduado do Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia, Hospital de S. João-E.P.E.; Professor Auxiliar Convidado de Otorrinolaringologia da Faculdade de Medicina do Porto
  • Jorge Santos Silva Assistente Hospitalar Graduado de Pediatria, Hospital de S. João-E.P.E.
  • Alcina Falcão Técnica de Audiologia do Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia, Hospital de S. João-E.P.E.
  • Tânia Gomes Técnica de Audiologia do Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia, Hospital de S. João-E.P.E.
  • Hercília Guimarães Directora do Serviço de Neonatologia, Hospital de S. João-E.P.E.; Professora Associada de Pediatria da Faculdade de Medicina do Porto
  • Margarida Santos Directora do Serviço de Otorrinolaringologia, Hospital de S. João-E.P.E.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.213

Keywords:

deafness, neonatal hearing screening, newborn, otoacoustic emissions, brainstem evoked auditory potential

Abstract

Objectives: Hearing loss is one of the most common congenital anomalies. Its detection and early intervention are crucial to the appropriate verbal, cognitive, behavioural and cognitive development. This study aimed to evaluate the neonatal hearing screening preformed at the Hospital S. João in the first 12 months since its implementation.

Study Design: Retrospective study

Material and Methods: Newborns infants admitted in the Well baby and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) submitted to audiometric evaluation by otoacoustic emissions complemented, whenever necessary, by brainstem auditory evoked potentials.

Results: The global coverage in the Maternity was 96% (2373) newborns from the initial population. One hundred and eight cases were lost. Three newborns presented with unilateral deafness and none had bilateral deafness. In the NICU, 175 (83%) newborns were evaluated. Five were diagnosed with bilateral deafness and one unilateral.

Conclusions: Neonatal hearing screening in all newborns, healthy or with risk factors is critical in early detection of hearing anomalies and the subsequent intervention.

References

Declau F, Boudewyns A, van den Ende J, Peeters A, et al. Etiologic and audiologic evaluations after universal hearing screening: analysis

of 170 referred neonates. Pediatrics 2008;121:1119-26

Kaye CI; Committee on Genetics. Newborn screening fact sheets. Pediatrics 2006;118:e934-63

Van Straaten HL, Tibosch CH, Dorrepaal C, Dekker FW, et al. Efficacy of automated auditory brainstem response hearing screening in very

preterm newborns. J Pediatr 2001;138:674-8

Hensch TK. Critical period regulation. Annu Rev Neurosci 2004;27:549-79

Gilley PM, Sharma A, Dorman MF. Cortical reorganization in children with cochlear implants. Brain Res 2008;1239:56-65

Kral A, Hartmann R, Tillein J, Heid S et al. Hearing after congenital deafness: central auditory plasticity and sensory deprivation. Cereb

Cortex 2002;12:797-807

Thompson DC, McPhillips H, Davis RL, Lieu TL, et al. Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence. JAMA 2001;286:2000-10

Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, Coulter DK, Mehl AL. Language of early and later identified children with hearing loss. Pediatrics

;102:1161-71

Lim G, Fortaleza K. Overcoming challenges in newborn hearing screening. J Perinatol 2000;20:S138-42

Yoshinaga-Itano C. Early intervention after universal neonatal hearing screening impact on outcomes. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res

Rev 2003;9:252-66

Davis A, Bamford J, Wilson I, Ramkalawan T, et al. A critical review of the role of neonatal hearing screening in the detection

of congenital hearing impairment. Hearing Technology Assessment 1997;1:1–105

Morton C, Nance WE. Newborn Hearing Screening-A silent revolution. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2151-64

Grupo de Rastreio e Intervenção da Surdez Infantil. Recomendações para o Rastreio Auditivo Neonatal Universal (RANU).

Acta Pediatr Port 2007;38:209-14

American Academy Of Pediatrics: Task Force on Newborn and Infant Hearing. Newborn and Infant Hearing Loss: Detection and

Intervention. Pediatrics 1999;103:527-30

Kirkim G, Serbettcioglu B, Erdag TK, Ceryan K. The frequency of auditory neuropathy detected by universal newborn hearing

screening program. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2008;72:1461-9

Foerst A, Beutner d, Lang-Roth R, Huttenbrink KB, et al. Prevalence of auditory neuropathy/sinaptopathy in a population of children with

profound hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006;70:1415-22

Sanes DH, Bao S. Tuning up the developing auditory CNS. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2009;19:188-99

Calonge N, Petitti DB, DeWitt TG, Gordis L, et al. Universal screening for hearing loss in newborns: US Preventive Services Task

Force recommendation statement. Pediatrics 2008;122:143-8

Jakubíková J, Kabátová Z, Pavlovcinová G, Profant M. Newborn hearing screening and strategy for early detection of hearing loss in

infants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009;73:607-12

Olusanya BO. Follow-up default in a hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening programme in a low-income country.

Child Care Health Dev 2009;35:190-8

Mukari SZ, Tan KY, Abdullah A. A pilot project on hospital-based universal newborn hearing screening: lessons learned. Int J Pediatr

Otorhinolaryngol 2006;70:843-51

American Academy of Pediatrics. Year 2007 Position Statement: Principles an Guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention

programs. Pediatrics 2007;120:898-921

Ribeiro A, Falcão A, Guimarães H. Spratley J, et al. Rastreio auditivo por otoemissões acústicas em recém-nascidos de risco. Abstract, VI

Congresso Português de Pediatria – Santa Maria da Feira, 17-19 Maio de 2001

How to Cite

Vaz, R., Spratley, J., Santos Silva, J., Falcão, A., Gomes, T., Guimarães, H., & Santos, M. (2010). Universal newborn hearing screening at S. João Hospital: first 12 months results. Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 48(4), 207–210. https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.213

Issue

Section

Original Article