Prevalence of nasal congestion amid hospital labor

Authors

  • B. Ferreira Gomez IDT, I.P. Delegação Regional do Centro – Unidade de Alcoologia de Coimbra
  • S. Massano Cardoso Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Social da Faculdade de Medicina, Coimbra
  • A. Arrobas Serviço de Pneumologia do Centro Hospitalar de Coimbra, E.P.E.
  • J. Gonçalves Dias SSST do Centro Hospitalar de Coimbra, E.P.E.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.222

Keywords:

prevalence, congestion, nasal, hospital, Coimbra

Abstract

Nasal congestion is a very common symptom that often accompanies the processes of infectious virus and allergic rhinitis; interfering with the quality of life and work of the patient may lead to a significant shrinkage of psychosocial interaction. Despite the scarce epidemiological data from the investigational point of view, the present study sought to assess the prevalence of nasal congestion in a population of workers from three hospital sites, Centro Hospitalar de Coimbra, E.P.E., Hospital Sobral Cid and the IDT, I.P. Delegação Regional do Centro.

Methodology: The study was conducted during the months of March, April and May 2008. A questionnaire was used for identification of seven symptoms occurring in the last two weeks and the symptoms occurred in the last week. The index of nasal congestion was calculated through the transformation of the first seven questions of the questionnaire. The descriptive statistics, ANOVA and factorial analysis of correspondence were used; the level of statistical significance was p <0.05.

Results and conclusions: 912 workers answered the questionnaires applied. For the seven questions that define the index of nasal congestion, we obtained a reliability coefficient of 0,873 and a suitability of KMO 0,892. Having made the transformation a reclassification of the index of nasal congestion in four classes resulted in the following: 20.6% of respondents showed no symptoms (class A), 58,5% showed mild symptoms (class B), 19% showed mild to moderate congestion (class C) and 2.2% reported severe symptoms (Class D). The fact that 21.2% of respondents refer severe or moderate symptoms is suggestive that the prevalence of nasal congestion in the study population is significant. It emphasizes the need for early diagnosis and treatment of this symptom so common in clinical practice.

References

Cadar A. Fisiologia nasal. Boletim dos Centros de Estudos do INAMPS, MG, 2(7):M-34: Jan/Mar 1980.

Carmo M, Bárbara C, Ferreira S, Branco J, et al... Avaliação da função dos músculos respiratórios em doentes com falência ventricular esquerda. Rev Port Pneumologia 2001, VII(6):455-462.

Roithmann R, Chapnik J. Obstrução nasal: Aspectos Gerais. www.scribd.com/doc/6539298/Obstrucao-Nasal-Livro-Art-Med Acedido em Agosto 2010.

Ferreira MB, Almeida MM, Cardoso SM et al.. Congestão Nasal em Portugal – Epidemiologia e Implicações. Rev Port de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirúrgia Cérvico-Facial 2008;46:151-60.

Bousquet J, Van Cauwenberge P, Khaltaev N, Aria Workshop Group; World Health Organization. Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001;108(Suppl):S147-334.

Dykewicz MS, Fineman S, Skoner DP, et al.. Diagnosis and managment of rhinitis: complete guidelines of the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters in Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1998;81:478-518

Togias A. Unique mechanistic features of allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;105:S599-604.

Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America 20: Number 2, May 2000.

Teles de Araújo T. ONDR – Relatório do Observatório Nacional das Doenças Respiratórias 2007. www.ondr.org/relatorios_ondr.html Acedido em Agosto 2010.

Strachan D, Sibbald B, Weiland S, et al.. Worldwide variations in prevalence of symptons of allergic rhinoconjuntivitis in children: the International Study of Asthma and Allergy in Childhood (ISAAC). Pediatr Allergy Immunol 1997;8:161-76

Cruz AA, Popov T, Pawankar R, et al.. ARIA Initiative Scientific Committee. Common characteristics of upper and lower airways in rhinitis and asthma: ARIA update, in collaboration with GA(2)LEN. Allergy 2007;62(Suppl.84):1-41.

Shedden A. Impact of nasal congestion on quality of life and work productivity in allergic rhinitis: findings from a large online survey. Treat Respir Med 2005;4:439-46.

Teles de Araújo A. Ambiente Urbano e Saúde – A Cidade, o Clima e os Cidadãos. Sociedade Port de Pneumologia 2000;5-160.

Leynaert B, Bousquet J, Neukirch C, et al.. Perennial rhinitis: an independent risk factor for asthma in nonatopic subjects: results from the European Community Respiratory Health Survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;104:301-4.

Linneberg. BMJ 2005:331.352 (letter).

Loureiro Graça. Rinite ocupacional: Dificuldades no diagnóstico e enquadramento epidemiológico. Rev. Port. Imunoalergologia 2008:16 (1): 7-27.

Van Kampen V, Merget R, Baur X. Occupational airway sensitizers: an overview on the respective literature. Am J Ind Med 2000; 38:164-218.

Nunes C, Ladeira S, Rosado Pinto JE. Definição, Epidemiologia e classificação da asma na criança. In: Rosado-Pinto JE, Morais-Almeida M (Eds.) A Criança Asmática no Mundo da Alergia. Algés: Euromédice, Edições Médicas Lda; 2003:pp35-55.

Caminha G. Pilla. Avaliação da Função nasal em indivíduos expostos ao TXIB; www.lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/7353 Acedido em Agosto 2010

Udaka T, Suzuki H, Fujimura T et al.. Relationships between nasal obstruction, observed apnea and daytime sleepiness. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;137:669-73.

Bousquet J, Bullinger M, Fayol C, et al.. Assessment of quality of life in patients with perennial allergic rhinitis with the French version of the SF-36 Health Status Questionnaire. J Allergy Clin Immmunol 1994;94:182-8.

Marshall PS, O’Hara C, Steinberg P. Effects of seasonal allergic rhinitis on selected cognitive abilities. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2000;84:403-10.

Young T, Peppard PE, Gottlieb DJ. Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:1217-39.

Morais-Almeida M, Nunes C, Gaspar A, et al.. Rinite em idade pré-escolar: prevalência e caracterização. Estudo ARPA Kids. Rev Port Imunoalergologia 2007;15:387-410.

Morais-Almeida M, Nunes C, Loureiro C, et al.. Prevalência de sintomas de rinite em estudantes portugueses dos 15 aos 25 anos - Estudo ARPA. Rev Port Imunoalergologia 2006;14(supl.1):3-12.

Morais-Almeida M, Loureiro C, Todo-Bom A, et al.. Avaliação da prevalência e caracterização da rinite em utentes dos cuidados de saúde primários de Portugal Continental – Estudo ARPA. Rev Port Imunoalergologia 2005;13(supl.2):3-14.

Todo-Bom A, Loureiro C, Morais-Almeida M, et al.. Epidemiology of rhinitis in Portugal: evaluation of the intermittent and the persistent types. Allergy 2007;62:1038-43.

Maurer M, Zuberbier T. Undertreatment of rhinitis symptoms in Europe: findings from a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Allergy 2007;62:1057-63.

Reed SD, Lee TA, McCrory DC. The economic burden of allergic rhinitis: a critical evaluation of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics 2004;22:345-61.

Nathan RA. The burden of allergic rhinitis. Allergy Asthma Proc 2007;28: 3-9.

Asahi S, Uehara R, Watanabe M, et al.. Respiratory symptoms correlating to smoking prevalence: the National Nutrition Survey and the National Lifestyle Survey in Japan. J Epidemiol 2003;13:226-31.

Akerlund A, Millqvist E, Oberg D, Bende M. Prevalence of upper and lower airway symptoms: the Skövde population-based study. Acta Otolaryngol 2006;126:483-8.

Fraga S, Sousa S, Santos AC, et al.. Tabagismo em Portugal Arq Med 2005;19:207-29.

Philpott CM, El-Alami M, Murty GE. The effect of steroid sex hormones on the nasal airway during normal menstrual cycle. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004;29:138-42.

Ieda M,Lenina M. Pesquisa da presença de receptores para estrógenio tipos alfa e beta na mucosa de conchas nasais inferiores através do método imunohistoquímico. ACTA 2007;25(3):173.

How to Cite

Ferreira Gomez, B., Massano Cardoso, S., Arrobas, A., & Gonçalves Dias, J. (2010). Prevalence of nasal congestion amid hospital labor. Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 48(3), 123–130. https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.222

Issue

Section

Original Article