Functional rhinoseptoplasty: clinical decision protocol

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.2188

Keywords:

Functional Rhinoseptoplasty, Chronic Nasal Obstruction, Nasal Septum, Nasal Valves, Facial Plastic Surgery

Abstract

Introduction: Functional Rhinoseptoplasty (F-RSP) is a complex procedure with increased morbidity and substantially longer operative time compared to conventional septoplasty. On this regard, the clinical decision concerning this procedure should be thoughtful and objective. Both the nasal septum and the internal and external nasal valves play crucial roles in nasal airflow, emphasizing the importance of directed physical examination in patients with chronic nasal obstruction. As a surgical procedure with facial aesthetic impact, the joint definition of appropriate aesthetic goals between physician and patient, the presence of body dysmorphic syndrome and recognition of prior and/or concomitant psychiatric pathology are of paramount importance.
Objectives: To present a diagnostic aid protocol and surgical guidance for patients undergoing FSP-R.
Materials and Methods: Literature review and adaptation of published algorithms.
Results: We identified 4 protocols in the international literature. Based on these, a protocol for approaching patients with chronic nasal obstruction and potential candidates for F-RSP was developed within the ENT consultation. Focused on clinical interview, it aims to investigate the real motivations and expectations of candidates for the procedure and to exclude those with uncontrolled psychiatric pathology, particularly in cases of suspected body dysmorphic syndrome. In the objective examination, it proposes methods for evaluating the internal and external nasal valve, nasal septum, and inferior turbinates, establishing a decisional score. It also allows for the description of the nasal pyramid from an aesthetic point of view; standardized photographic documentation of patients and their facial morphing to plan the surgical procedure.
Conclusions: This protocol systematizes surgical indications for F-RSP in ENT consultations. However, it still requires practical application in consultation and recording of the respective results in the Portuguese population for validation purposes.

References

Machado AS, Santos M, Silva A, Saltychev M, Meireles L, Most S. et al. Validation of the european portuguese language version of the standardized cosmesis and health nasal outcomes survey. Facial Plast Surg. 2023 Aug;39(4):372-376. doi: 10.1055/a-2006-0807.

Behnke J, Dundervill C, Bulbul M, Armeni M, Ramadan HH, Makary CA. Using the sino-nasal outcome test (SNOT-22) to study outcome of treatment of nasal obstruction. Am J Otolaryngol. 2023 Jul-Aug;44(4):103879. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103879.

Floyd EM, Ho S, Patel P, Rosenfeld RM, Gordin E. Systematic review and meta‐analysis of studies evaluating functional rhinoplasty outcomes with the NOSE score. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 May;156(5):809-815. doi: 10.1177/0194599817691272.

Kim DW, Rodriguez-Bruno K. Functional rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2009 Feb;17(1):115-31, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2008.09.011.

Stewart MG, Smith TL, Weaver EM, Witsell DL, Yueh B, Hannley MT. et al. Outcomes after nasal septoplasty: results from the nasal obstruction septoplasty effectiveness (NOSE) study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Mar;130(3):283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2003.12.004.

Singh A, Patel N, Kenyon G, Donaldson G. Is there objective evidence that septal surgery improves nasal airflow? J Laryngol Otol. 2006 Nov;120(11):916-20. doi: 10.1017/S0022215106003410.

Nguyen PS, Bardot J, Duron JB, Levet Y, Aiach G. Preoperative analysis in rhinoplasty. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2014 Dec;59(6):400-5. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2014.07.010.

Friedman O, Cekic E, Gunel C. Functional rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2017 May;25(2):195-199. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2016.12.004.

Sinkler MA, Wehrle CJ, Elphingstone JW, Magidson E, Ritter EF, Brown JJ. Surgical management of the internal nasal valve: a review of surgical approaches. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Jun;45(3):1127-1136. doi: 10.1007/s00266-020-02075-5.

Rettinger G. Risks and complications in rhinoplasty. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007:6:Doc08.

Rohrich RJ, Ahmad J. Rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Aug;128(2):49e-73e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31821e7191.

Ziglinas P, Menger DJ, Georgalas C. The body dysmorphic disorder patient: to perform rhinoplasty or not? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Sep;271(9):2355-8. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2792-6.

Picavet VA, Gabriëls L, Grietens J, Jorissen M, Prokopakis EP, Hellings PW. Preoperative symptoms of body dysmorphic disorder determine postoperative satisfaction and quality of life in aesthetic rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Apr;131(4):861-868. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182818f02.

G. J. Nolst Trenite Ed. Rhinoplasty a practical guide to functional and aesthetic surgery of the nose. Kugler publications; 1993.

Kim DW, Toriumi DM. Management of posttraumatic nasal deformities: the crooked nose and the saddle nose. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2004 Feb;12(1):111-32. doi: 10.1016/S1064-7406(03)00124-X.

Chisholm E, Jallali N. Rhinoplasty and Septorhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation. Ear Nose Throat J. 2012 Mar;91(3):E10-4. doi: 10.1177/014556131209100315.

Boiko NV. Epistaxis and arterial hypertension: a pathogenic link. Vestn Otorinolaringol. 2021;86(1):72-77. doi: 10.17116/otorino20218601172.

Cochran CS, Landecker A. Prevention and management of rhinoplasty complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Aug;122(2):60e-67e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d53de.

Bugten V, Nilsen AH, Thorstensen WM, Moxness MHS, Amundsen MF, Nordgård S. Quality of life and symptoms before and after nasal septoplasty compared with healthy individuals. BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2016 Oct 28:16:13. doi: 10.1186/s12901-016-0031-7.

García-Paz V, Chamorro-Petronacci CM, Painceira-Villar R, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo R, Losa-Iglesias ME, Pérez-Sayáns M. et al. Allergic rhinitis improvement after septorhinoplasty in a sample of allergic rhinitis patients with septal deviation: a quasi-experimental study. Sao Paulo Med J. 2022 Jan-Feb;140(1):17-23. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0236.R1.03052021

Erol O, Koycu A. The effect of smoking on septoplasty and septorhinoplasty outcomes. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Jun;46(3):1378-1384. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02683-9.

Coon D, Tuffaha S, Christensen J, Bonawitz SC. Plastic surgery and smoking: a prospective analysis of incidence, compliance, and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Feb;131(2):385-391. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318277886a.

Guyuron B, Afrooz PN. Correction of cocaine-related nasal defects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Mar;121(3):1015-1023. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000299464.02430.78.

Romo T 3rd, Horne S, Ferzli G Jr. Nasal grafts and implants in revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2006 Nov;14(4):373-87, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2006.06.006.

Paun SH, Nolst Trenité GJ. Revision rhinoplasty: an overview of deformities and techniques. Facial Plast Surg. 2008 Aug;24(3):271-87. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1083082.

Adamson PA, Warner J, Becker D, Romo TJ 3rd, Toriumi DM. Revision rhinoplasty: panel discussion, controversies, and techniques. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2014 Feb;22(1):57-96. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2013.09.002.

Ramos HHA, Freire L, Cavallieri F, Frota AE, Ragazzo R, Jurado JRP. Management of patients seeking surgical rhinoplasty with previous nasal injections of hyaluronic acid. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2021 Aug;45(4):1675-1682. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02136-3.

Guastafierro A, Rosso S, Avvedimento S, Cannistrà C, Grella E. Surgical rhinoplasty after hyaluronic acid injection: what are the implications? Our experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Apr;46(2):1021-1023. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02385-2.

Hogan VM. Cutaneous scars and cosmetic surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 1971 Apr;51(2):491-500. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(16)39392-6.

Published

2024-12-08

How to Cite

Arede Antunes, M., Fernandes, R., Arede, C., Martins, P., & Luís, L. (2024). Functional rhinoseptoplasty: clinical decision protocol. Portuguese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, 62(4), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.34631/sporl.2188

Issue

Section

Original Article